A pediatric hospital-wide asthma severity score: Reliability and effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a leading cause of pediatric hospitalization in the United States. Children hospitalized with asthma are often managed in different care settings during hospitalization, posing challenges to accurate communication among care providers about illness severity. Our objective was to study the feasibility, reliability, and safety of a new pediatric hospital-wide asthma severity score (HASS) across different care units within a single tertiary-care pediatric center. METHODS: 150 patients between the ages of 2 and 18 years hospitalized with a principal diagnosis of status asthmaticus were included in this study. Study patients were followed from the time of initial triage in the emergency department until the time of medical readiness for discharge. Rates of medical errors, early transfers to a higher level of care and medically indicated hospital length of stay (LOS) were compared between 75 patients before and 75 patients after widespread implementation of the HASS using retrospective chart review and anonymous staff reporting. Interrater reliability was determined by collecting independent HASS scores from blinded staff members after tandem or simultaneous patient assessment. RESULTS: Interrater reliability among untrained staff members using the HASS was high. Hospital LOS, rates of adverse events, medical errors, and early transfer to a higher level of care were not significantly different before and after widespread HASS implementation. CONCLUSION: The HASS is a reliable asthma severity tool that can be used throughout hospitalization and among multiple clinical providers to trend clinical progress and optimize communication, particularly during times of care handoffs.

Quality Improvement Incorporating a Feedback Loop for Accurate Medication Reconciliation.

OBJECTIVES: Medication reconciliation errors on hospital admission can lead to significant patient harm. A pediatric intermediate care unit initiated a quality improvement project and aimed to reduce errors in admission medication reconciliation by 50% in 12 months. METHODS: From August 2017 to December 2018, a multidisciplinary team conducted a quality improvement project with plan-do-study-act methodology. Continuous data collection was achieved by reviewing medications with home caregivers within 18 hours of admission to identify errors. Cycle 1 consisted of nursing training in accurate and thorough medication history documentation. Cycle 2 was aimed at improving data collection. Cycle 3 was aimed at improving pediatric housestaff processes for medication reconciliation. In cycle 4 intervention, the reconciliation process was redesigned to incorporate the bedside nurse reviewing final medication orders with the patient's home caregivers once the medication reconciliation process was complete. Intermittent maintenance data collection continued for 12 months thereafter. RESULTS: Cycle 1 and 2 interventions resulted in improvement in the medication reconciliation error rate from 9.8% to 4.7%. In cycle 2, the data collection rate improved from 61% to 80% of admissions sustained. Cycle 3 resulted in a further reduction in the medication error rate to 2.9%, which was sustained in cycle 4 and over the 12-month maintenance period. A patient's number of home medications did not correlate with the error rate. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in admission medication reconciliation errors can be achieved with staff education on medication history and process for medication reconciliation and with process redesign that incorporates active medication order review as a closed-loop communication with home caregivers.

Standardized Protocol Is Associated With a Decrease in Continuous Albuterol Use and Length of Stay in Critical Status Asthmaticus.

OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to reduce duration of continuous albuterol and hospital length of stay in critically ill children with severe status asthmaticus. DESIGN: Observational prospective study from September 2012 to May 2016. SETTING: Medicine ICU and intermediate care unit. PATIENTS: Children greater than 2 years old with admission diagnosis of status asthmaticus admitted on continuous albuterol and managed via a standardized protocol. INTERVENTIONS: The protocol was an iterative algorithm for escalation and weaning of therapy. The algorithm underwent three revisions. Iteration 1 concentrated on reducing duration on continuous albuterol; iteration 2 concentrated on reducing hospital length of stay; and iteration 3 concentrated on reducing helium-oxygen delivered continuous albuterol. Balancing measures included adverse events and readmissions. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Three-hundred eighty-five patients were treated as follows: 123, 138, and 124 in iterations 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Baseline data was gathered from an additional 150 patients prior to protocol implementation. There was no difference in median age (6 vs 8 vs 7 vs 7 yr; p = 0.130), asthma severity score (9 vs 9 vs 9 vs 9; p = 0.073), or female gender (42% vs 41% vs 43% vs 48%; p = 0.757). Using statistical process control charts, the mean duration on continuous albuterol decreased from 24.9 to 17.5 hours and the mean hospital length of stay decreased from 76 to 49 hours. There was no difference in adverse events (0% vs 1% vs 4% vs 0%; p = 0.054) nor in readmissions (0% vs 0% vs 1% vs 2%; p = 0.254). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a quality improvement protocol in critically ill patients with status asthmaticus was associated with a decrease in continuous albuterol duration and hospital length of stay.